Values and rights, rule of law, security
#TheFutureIsYours Looking after citizens’ freedoms
What does the Brussels IIb Regulation bring? — Innovations in cross-border family procedures
The number of marriages and cohabitations between persons from different EU Member States is steadily increasing. As a result, cross-border disputes over parental care or the handling of children from such relationships have also increased. This is because it is not uncommon for a parent to leave the State of common residence with the common children without appropriate custody rules after separation from the partner, or that the child is not returned to the other parent after leave abroad. These and other conflict situations can only be overcome or at best prevented if the European legal instruments are known. As part of the Conference on the Future of Europe, we are pleased to present to you the so-called Brussels IIb Regulation, which will apply from August 2022, and to discuss with you the resulting opportunities in cross-border legal transactions. Find out how the Federal Office of Justice, as the Central Authority, can assist if a parent and child are already or may be affected by a cross-border custody or contact dispute or international child abduction. The Brussels IIb Regulation replaces the Brussels IIa Regulation as of 01/08/2022 and regulates international jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of orders from other Member States in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility and international child abduction.
Littenstraße 9, 10179 Berlin
Share:
Share link:
Please paste this code in your page:
<script src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/ValuesRights/f/11/meetings/64154/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/ValuesRights/f/11/meetings/64154/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
- Call us 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
- Use other telephone options
- Write to us via our contact form
- Meet us at a local EU office
- European Parliament
- European Council
- Council of the European Union
- European Commission
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
- European Central Bank (ECB)
- European Court of Auditors (ECA)
- European External Action Service (EEAS)
- European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
- European Committee of the Regions (CoR)
- European Investment Bank (EIB)
- European Ombudsman
- European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
- European Data Protection Board
- European Personnel Selection Office
- Publications Office of the European Union
- Agencies
2 comments
Dear Mr Geiger,on behalf of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, thank you for your online petition “Corruption, Fraud and Human Rights Violations in German Family Law” of 24 February 2019. Neither UN human rights nor UN children’s rights are observed in many cases by youth offices in Germany when parents separate.Most the father is alienated from the life of the children.Youth offices even cover up clinic reports about child abuse by the mother, the family court and the father. But the 2 children were already 12 times in child psychiatry and the youth offices only watched. Youth offices lie & scams even in court u accept accusations of a mother without checking for truth, they go to court. Anti-Semitism Threats and Fraud is at the day sorting in many youth offices, even with purely German parents covered up by the Bundestag.
What I've seen since mid-2021: Subject: Information according to the GDPR in connection with the administrative unit youth office. 5 out of 5 youth welfare offices violate GDPR. Either files were not passed on after the mother’s move with the children,this was the case with 3 youth welfare offices.The 4 Jugendamt has listed data stored in the custody proceedings which never existed. There were appointments on which I got custody at the court, since I had no custody for years. In the 5 youth offices that I know, there is an incredible slutty, fraud, blackmail, discrimination and a complaint is impossible.Even judges reject the evidence of mistakes.Everyone proceeds from the non-supervising parent complaining for revenge or otherwise lower reasons. From 2015 to the present day I try to clarify,each complaint will be examined as unfounded and carefully examined.But in case of no review GDPR above.
Loading comments ...