Stop moving to Strasbourg, at least for the climate
20.000 tones of CO2, 110 million euros that could be invested climate friendly and we don't get it. Just enjoy the awesome building in Brussels. Your time is worth so much more.
Endorsed by
and 37 more people (see more) (see less)
and 38 more people (see more) (see less)
Fingerprint
The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.
Value:
47aed1c5c3e0c0fef4ac88e70885fc05262b83abb3cd7600f9c1e8224969fafd
Source:
{"body":{"de":"20.000 tones of CO2, 110 million euros that could be invested climate friendly and we don't get it. Just enjoy the awesome building in Brussels. Your time is worth so much more.","machine_translations":{"bg":"20 000 тона CO2, 110 милиона евро, които биха могли да бъдат инвестирани щадящи климата, и не ги получаваме. Просто насладете се на ужасната сграда в Брюксел. Времето ви е много по-голямо.","cs":"20 000 tun CO2, 110 milionů EUR, které by mohly být investovány způsobem šetrným ke klimatu a nedostaneme je. Jen si v Bruselu využijte vítěznou budovu. Váš čas stojí mnohem více.","da":"20.000 ton CO2, 110 mio. EUR, som kunne investeres klimavenligt, og vi får det ikke. Godt godt af awesom-bygningen i Bruxelles. Tiden er så meget mere værd.","el":"20.000 τόνοι CO2, 110 εκατομμύρια ευρώ που θα μπορούσαν να επενδυθούν φιλικά προς το κλίμα και δεν το πετύχουμε. Απολαμβάνετε μόνο το περίεργο κτίριο στις Βρυξέλλες. Ο χρόνος σας αξίζει τόσο πολύ περισσότερο.","en":"20.000 tones of CO2, 110 million euros that could be invested climate friendly and we don’t get it. Just enjoy the awesome building in Brussels. Your time is worth so much more.","es":"20.000 toneladas de CO2, 110 millones de euros que podrían invertirse de manera respetuosa con el clima y no lo conseguimos. Disfrutar del edificio auesome de Bruselas. Tu tiempo merece mucho más.","et":"20 000 tonni CO2, 110 miljonit eurot, mida saaks investeerida kliimasõbralikku ja me seda ei saa. Nautige lihtsalt Brüsselis asuvat õnnitlushoonet. Teie aeg on väärt palju enamat.","fi":"20 000 hiilidioksidiekvivalenttitonnia, 110 miljoonaa euroa, jotka voitaisiin investoida ilmastoystävälliseen suuntaan, emmekä saa sitä. Nauti Brysselissä sijaitsevasta rakennuksesta. Aikasi ansaitsee paljon enemmän.","fr":"20.000 tones of CO2, 110 million d’euros that could be invested climate friendly and we don’t get it. JUST enjoy the awesome building à Brussels. Your time is worth so mouch more.","ga":"20.000 toin CO2, 110 milliún euro a d’fhéadfaí a infheistiú atá neamhdhíobhálach don aeráid agus nach bhfaighimid é. Bain sult as an bhfoirgneamh uamhnach sa Bhruiséil. Is fiú i bhfad níos mó ama do chuid ama.","hr":"20 000 tona CO2, 110 milijuna eura koji bi se mogli uložiti na klimatski prihvatljiv način, a mi ga ne dobivamo. Samo uživajte u zgradi awesome u Bruxellesu. Vaše vrijeme vrijedi mnogo više.","hu":"20 000 tonna szén-dioxid, 110 millió euró, amelyet éghajlatbarát módon lehetne befektetni, és amelyet nem kapunk meg. Élvezze a brüsszeli enyhébb épületet! Az ided sokkal többet érdemel.","it":"20.000 tonnellate di CO2, 110 milioni di euro che potrebbero essere investiti in modo rispettoso del clima e noi non otteniamo. Vai solo l'edificio awesome a Bruxelles. Il vostro tempo vale molto di più.","lt":"20 000 tonų CO2, 110 mln. EUR, kuriuos būtų galima investuoti į klimatui palankią aplinką, ir to nepadarome. Mėgaukitės nuostabiu pastatu Briuselyje. Jūsų laikas vertas dar daugiau.","lv":"20 000 tonnu CO2, 110 miljoni eiro, ko varētu ieguldīt klimatam draudzīgā veidā, un mēs to nesaņemam. Izbaudi brīnišķīgo ēku Briselē. Jūsu laiks ir tik vērtīgs.","mt":"20.000 tunnellata ta’ CO2, EUR 110 miljun li jistgħu jiġu investiti favur il-klima u ma nkisbux. Kemm kemm tgawdi l-binja sabiħa fi Brussell. Il-ħin tiegħek jiswa ħafna aktar.","nl":"20.000 ton CO2, 110 miljoen EUR die klimaatvriendelijk zou kunnen worden geïnvesteerd en we krijgen dat niet. Gewoon genieten van het awesogebouw in Brussel. Jouw tijd is zo veel meer waard.","pl":"20 000 ton CO2, 110 mln euro, które można by zainwestować w działania przyjazne dla klimatu i nie otrzymujemy ich. Po prostu cieszyć się nieobecnym budynkiem w Brukseli. Twój czas jest znacznie bardziej warty.","pt":"20,000 toneladas de CO2, 110 milhões de euros que poderiam ser investidos respeitadores do clima e que não conseguimos obter. Só desfrutam do edifício awesome em Bruxelas. O seu tempo vale muito mais.","ro":"20.000 de tone de CO2, 110 de milioane de euro care ar putea fi investite în condiții favorabile climei și nu le putem obține. Să ne bucurăm de clădirea plină de la Bruxelles. Timpul dumneavoastră merită mult mai mult.","sk":"20 000 ton CO2, 110 miliónov EUR, ktoré by mohli byť investované šetrné ku klíme a nezískame ho. Teším sa len na nepriaznivú budovu v Bruseli. Váš čas stojí oveľa viac.","sl":"2000 ton CO2, 110 milijonov EUR, ki bi jih lahko vlagali podnebju prijazni in jih ne bi dobili. Dobrodošli v otroštvu v Bruslju. Vaš čas je vreden še veliko več.","sv":"20.000 ton CO2, 110 miljoner euro som skulle kunna investeras klimatvänligt och vi får inte det. Njuta bara av den obehagliga byggnaden i Bryssel. Din tid är mycket mer värd."}},"title":{"de":"Stop moving to Strasbourg, at least for the climate","machine_translations":{"bg":"Спрете да се преместите в Страсбург, поне заради климата","cs":"Přestat stěhovat se do Štrasburku, alespoň pro klima","da":"Stop for at flytte til Strasbourg, i det mindste af hensyn til klimaet","el":"Σταματήστε τη μετάβαση στο Στρασβούργο, τουλάχιστον για το κλίμα","en":"Stop moving to Strasbourg, at least for the climate","es":"Dejar de desplazarse a Estrasburgo, al menos por motivos climáticos","et":"Peatage kolimine Strasbourgi vähemalt kliima pärast","fi":"Lopeta siirtyminen Strasbourgiin ainakin ilmaston vuoksi","fr":"Stop moving to Strasbourg, at least for the climate","ga":"Stad ag bogadh go Strasbourg, ar a laghad don aeráid","hr":"Prestanite se seliti u Strasbourg, barem zbog klime","hu":"Ne költözzenek Strasbourgba, legalább az éghajlat érdekében","it":"Smettere di spostarsi a Strasburgo, almeno per il clima","lt":"Sustabdyti persikėlimą į Strasbūrą, bent jau dėl klimato","lv":"Pārstāj doties uz Strasbūru, vismaz klimatam","mt":"Ieqaf tiċċaqlaq lejn Strasburgu, tal-anqas għall-klima","nl":"Stop te verhuizen naar Straatsburg, ten minste voor het klimaat","pl":"Zaprzestać przeprowadzki do Strasburga, przynajmniej z myślą o klimacie","pt":"Deixar de se deslocar para Estrasburgo, pelo menos pelo clima","ro":"Nu vă mai mutați la Strasbourg, cel puțin pentru climă","sk":"Prestať presťahovať sa do Štrasburgu, aspoň pokiaľ ide o klímu","sl":"Prenehati seliti v Strasbourg, vsaj zaradi podnebja","sv":"Sluta flytta till Strasbourg, åtminstone för klimatet"}}}
This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.
Share:
Share link:
Please paste this code in your page:
<script src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/OtherIdeas/f/8/proposals/788/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/OtherIdeas/f/8/proposals/788/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
- Call us 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
- Use other telephone options
- Write to us via our contact form
- Meet us at a local EU office
- European Parliament
- European Council
- Council of the European Union
- European Commission
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
- European Central Bank (ECB)
- European Court of Auditors (ECA)
- European External Action Service (EEAS)
- European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
- European Committee of the Regions (CoR)
- European Investment Bank (EIB)
- European Ombudsman
- European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
- European Data Protection Board
- European Personnel Selection Office
- Publications Office of the European Union
- Agencies
10 comments
Je ne suis pas d'accord sur le fait de tout centraliser à Bruxelles. Certes, deux parlements, c'est trop mais pourquoi ne pas respecter les traités et mettre tout le travail des parlementaires à Strasbourg. Point positif le bâtiment à Strasbourg est bien mieux isolé et réduirait les coûts de chauffage. De plus, le débat entre Strasbourg et Bruxelles est plus important que simplement le lieu de travail des députés. Bruxelles symbolise la bureaucratie, il en faut mais il doit y avoir autre chose avec. Si Strasbourg a été choisi pour mettre une telle institution avec des élus parlant 24 langues et provenant de 27 pays différents, c'est pour le symbole. Strasbourg et sa région ont été auparavant au centre de la confrontation militaire en Europe. Montrer au monde entier et aux prochaines générations qu'il est possible de réconcilier des peuples jadis ennemis est le sens de la construction européenne. Il serait dommage d'oublier que le projet européen est un projet de paix.
Ich bin dafür. Ich finde es auch sinnvoll, dass sowohl Kommission als auch Parlament in Brüssel sind und nicht getrennt, da beide Organe zusammenarbeiten (sollten). Falls das Parlament in den nächsten Jahren und Jahrzehnten mehr Macht bekommt, was ich hoffe, würde sich das Regierungszentrum der EU ansonsten immer weiter nach Straßburg verlagern.
This would be a awful idea. This "awesome building in Brussels" is so well done that it needs to be completely rebuild, at a cost of 500 M euros, even though it is only 30 years old! This is not very eco-friendly either... On the other hand, Strasbourg has a perfectly operational headquarters, and this since the beginning.
Brussels is the bureaucracy in a state capital. It is the symbol of an EU that privileges the interests of its member states rather than those of its citizens. Strasbourg is the cultural capital of the EU, a regional capital, which favors the EU of the regions, and it is the symbol of peace in Europe.
The centralism of the EU is an important reason of the rampant euroscepticism, and putting the European Parliament only in Brussels will only reinforce it. It would be much more logical to do the opposite, and put the European Parliament only in Strasbourg.
I understand that moving everything to Strasbourg is an old compromise to make France feel important many decades ago, but this has to stop. It is hugely damaging to EU's image in some member countries, France is already one of the most important EU members and doesn't need this anymore, and frankly any talk about a greener Europe while still pointlessly going back and forth between Bxl and Strasbourg sounds hollow and hypocritical.
Nope. I want Strasbourg to be my Parliament. Of course it costs money. That's not an argument.
Instead close Parliament in Brussels.
Or make time periods between shifts longer. Like 6 months or so.
As a French person, I hate this obsession that many from my country have with having that one seat of the institutions in their country. It should not matter what country the institutions are seated it, their mission is always to serve the whole Union. And the general consensus among MEPs seems to be that it would be more practical for the Parliament to be permanently seated in Brussels. But there also seems to be arguments in favor of it being permanently in Strasbourg. Wherever it is, the point remains the same: it should be in one place only. Moving all the time is utterly pointless.
Change Strasbourg for Lille: a single seat for the Parliament that stays in France, and with easy commuting from Brussels. That can satisfy France and save greenhouse gases and money.
Niemand geht nach Straßburg. Straßburg ist nämlich der Sitz des Europäischen Parlamentes. Abzustellen wäre also die Reise in den Zweitsitz in Brüssel.
Die beste Lösung aus meiner Sicht wäre ein 2-Kammern Parlament.
Remove the Parliament altogether in Brussels AND Strasbourg. Problem solved.
It is ridiculous that we are moving a whole parliament 12 times per year. For organizational reasons geographic proximity to other institutions is key. 103 Mio. Euros could be saved by a permanent parliament in Brussels. But apart from economical reasons: In a time of crucial climate tipping points, we can't credibly promote renunciation and innovation and on the other hand stick to two parliament seats. Be that for traditional or symbolic reasons. Treaties can be changed and as much as these points are valid, in a discussion points have to be offset against each other, and there I see a much stronger case for Brussels that moving there permanently is inevitable.
Loading comments ...