Migration
#TheFutureIsYours Managing migration through a predictable, balanced and reliable system
Migration Migraine: EU to Erect 3 Lines of Defense
The EU should revise its migration policies, including three lines of defense:
1) Frontline – Refugee camps and asylum application centers to be established outside the EU.
2) External borders – Frontex to stop illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking (etc.), with 10,000 border guards.
3) Internal borders – National best practices in migration policies to be implemented at the EU level.
Modern crusades (to Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan…) have been the root cause of recent immigration. Exporting western values to eastern backwaters and hinterlands has not been a great success. We export democracy and import refugees. The EU must re-think its external relations and foreign policies.
The EU clearly needs new medicine for its old migration migraine.
Endorsed by
and 3 more people (see more) (see less)
and 4 more people (see more) (see less)
Fingerprint
The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.
Value:
4ce6c5faba63148186eb349f87eb44ed6d361dd9339ff875a3d420e1d6ee8938
Source:
{"body":{"en":"The EU should revise its migration policies, including three lines of defense:\n\n1)\tFrontline – Refugee camps and asylum application centers to be established outside the EU.\n2)\tExternal borders – Frontex to stop illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking (etc.), with 10,000 border guards.\n3)\tInternal borders – National best practices in migration policies to be implemented at the EU level.\n\nModern crusades (to Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan…) have been the root cause of recent immigration. Exporting western values to eastern backwaters and hinterlands has not been a great success. We export democracy and import refugees. The EU must re-think its external relations and foreign policies.\n\nThe EU clearly needs new medicine for its old migration migraine.","machine_translations":{"bg":"ЕС следва да преразгледа своите политики в областта на миграцията, включително три линии на отбрана: 1) Frontline – Бежански лагери и центрове за молби за убежище, които ще бъдат установени извън ЕС. 2) Външни граници – Frontex да спре незаконната имиграция, контрабандата и трафика (и т.н.), с 10 000 гранични служители. 3) Вътрешни граници – Национални най-добри практики в миграционните политики, които трябва да се прилагат на равнище ЕС. Съвременните кръстоносни походи (към Либия, Сирия, Ирак, Афганистан...) са основната причина за неотдавнашната имиграция. Износът на западни ценности към източните задни води и хинтерландите не е голям успех. Изнасяме демокрация и внасяме бежанци. ЕС трябва да преосмисли своите външни отношения и външни политики. ЕС очевидно се нуждае от нова медицина за старата си миграция мигрена.","cs":"EU by měla revidovat své migrační politiky, včetně tří oblastí obrany: 1) Frontline - uprchlické tábory a střediska pro žádosti o azyl, která mají být zřízena mimo EU. 2) Vnější hranice - Frontex s cílem zastavit nedovolené přistěhovalectví, převaděčství a obchodování s lidmi (atd.) s 10 000 příslušníky pohraniční stráže. 3) Vnitřní hranice - vnitrostátní osvědčené postupy v migračních politikách, které mají být prováděny na úrovni EU. Hlavní příčinou nedávného přistěhovalectví byly moderní křížové výpravy (do Libye, Sýrie, Iráku, Afghánistánu...). Vývoz západních hodnot do východních pramenů a vnitrozemí nebyl velký úspěch. Vyvážíme demokracii a dovážíme uprchlíky. EU musí přehodnotit své vnější vztahy a zahraniční politiky. EU jednoznačně potřebuje novou medicínu pro svou starou migrénu migrace.","da":"EU bør revidere sine migrationspolitikker, herunder tre forsvarslinjer: 1) Frontline – Flygtningelejre og asylcentre, der skal oprettes uden for EU. 2) De ydre grænser – Frontex skal standse ulovlig indvandring, smugling og menneskehandel (osv.) med 10 000 grænsevagter. 3) Indre grænser – national bedste praksis inden for migrationspolitikker, der skal gennemføres på EU-plan. Moderne korstog (til Libyen, Syrien, Irak, Afghanistan...) har været hovedårsagen til den seneste indvandring. Eksport af vestlige værdier til østlige backwaters og baglandet har ikke været nogen stor succes. Vi eksporterer demokrati og importerer flygtninge. EU skal genoverveje sine eksterne forbindelser og udenrigspolitik. EU har helt klart brug for ny medicin til sin gamle migræne.","de":"Die EU sollte ihre Migrationspolitik, einschließlich dreier Verteidigungslinien, überarbeiten: 1) Frontline – Flüchtlingslager und Asylantragszentren sollen außerhalb der EU eingerichtet werden. 2) Außengrenzen – Frontex, um illegale Einwanderung, Schmuggel und Menschenhandel mit 10.000 Grenzschutzbeamten zu stoppen. 3) Binnengrenzen – auf EU-Ebene umzusetzende nationale bewährte Verfahren in der Migrationspolitik. Moderne Kreuzzüge (nach Libyen, Syrien, Irak, Afghanistan...) sind die Hauptursache der jüngsten Einwanderung. Der Export westlicher Werte in östliche Backwaters und Hinterlande war kein großer Erfolg. Wir exportieren Demokratie und importieren Flüchtlinge. Die EU muss ihre Außenbeziehungen und ihre Außenpolitik überdenken. Die EU braucht eindeutig neue Medikamente für ihre alte Migrationsmigräne.","el":"Η ΕΕ θα πρέπει να αναθεωρήσει τις μεταναστευτικές πολιτικές της, συμπεριλαμβανομένων τριών αμυντικών γραμμών: 1) Frontline – Καταυλισμοί προσφύγων και κέντρα αιτήσεων ασύλου που θα εγκατασταθούν εκτός της ΕΕ. 2) Εξωτερικά σύνορα – ο Frontex θα σταματήσει την παράνομη μετανάστευση, το λαθρεμπόριο και την εμπορία ανθρώπων (κ.λπ.), με 10.000 συνοριοφύλακες. 3) Εσωτερικά σύνορα – Εθνικές βέλτιστες πρακτικές στις μεταναστευτικές πολιτικές που πρέπει να εφαρμοστούν σε επίπεδο ΕΕ. Οι σύγχρονες σταυροφορίες (στη Λιβύη, τη Συρία, το Ιράκ, το Αφγανιστάν...) αποτέλεσαν τη βασική αιτία της πρόσφατης μετανάστευσης. Η εξαγωγή δυτικών αξιών σε ανατολικές πλαγιές και ενδοχώρες δεν υπήρξε μεγάλη επιτυχία. Εξάγουμε δημοκρατία και εισάγουμε πρόσφυγες. Η ΕΕ πρέπει να επανεξετάσει τις εξωτερικές της σχέσεις και τις εξωτερικές της πολιτικές. Η ΕΕ χρειάζεται σαφώς νέα φάρμακα για την παλαιά μεταναστευτική ημικρανία.","es":"La UE debería revisar sus políticas migratorias, incluidas tres líneas de defensa: 1) Frontline – Campos de refugiados y centros de solicitud de asilo que se establecerán fuera de la UE. 2) Fronteras exteriores – Frontex para detener la inmigración ilegal, el contrabando y la trata de personas (etc.), con 10.000 guardias de fronteras. 3) Fronteras interiores – Mejores prácticas nacionales en materia de políticas migratorias que deben aplicarse a nivel de la UE. Las cruzadas modernas (a Libia, Siria, Irak, Afganistán...) han sido la causa fundamental de la inmigración reciente. La exportación de valores occidentales a los remansos orientales y al interior no ha sido un gran éxito. Exportamos democracia e importamos refugiados. La UE debe repensar sus relaciones exteriores y sus políticas exteriores. Es evidente que la UE necesita nuevos medicamentos para su vieja migraña migratoria.","et":"EL peaks läbi vaatama oma rändepoliitika, sealhulgas kolm kaitseliini: 1) Frontline – pagulaslaagrid ja varjupaigataotluste keskused, mis luuakse väljaspool ELi. 2) Välispiirid – Frontex peatab ebaseadusliku sisserände, smugeldamise ja inimkaubanduse (jne), 10 000 piirivalvuriga. 3) Sisepiirid – liikmesriikide rändepoliitika parimad tavad, mida tuleb rakendada ELi tasandil. Hiljutise sisserände algpõhjuseks on olnud tänapäevased ristisõjad (Liibüasse, Süüriasse, Iraaki, Afganistani jne). Lääne väärtuste eksportimine idapoolsetesse tagasivette ja sisemaale ei ole olnud väga edukas. Me ekspordime demokraatiat ja impordime pagulasi. EL peab oma välissuhted ja välispoliitika uuesti läbi mõtlema. EL vajab oma vana rändemigreeni jaoks selgelt uusi ravimeid.","fi":"EU:n olisi tarkistettava muuttoliikepolitiikkaansa, mukaan lukien kolme puolustuslinjaa: 1) Etulinja – EU:n ulkopuolelle perustettavat pakolaisleirit ja turvapaikkakeskukset. 2) Ulkorajat – Frontex lopettaa laittoman maahanmuuton, salakuljetuksen ja ihmiskaupan (esim.), jossa on 10 000 rajavartijaa. 3) Sisärajat – EU:n tasolla toteutettavien maahanmuuttopolitiikkojen parhaat käytännöt. Nykyaikaiset ristiretket (Libyaan, Syyriaan, Irakiin, Afganistaniin jne.) ovat olleet äskettäisen maahanmuuton perimmäinen syy. Länsimaisten arvojen vieminen itäisiin takavesiin ja sisämaahan ei ole ollut suuri menestys. Viemme demokratiaa ja maahantuontipakolaisia. EU:n on harkittava ulkosuhteitaan ja ulkopolitiikkaansa uudelleen. EU tarvitsee selvästi uutta lääkettä vanhaan migreeniinsä.","fr":"L’UE devrait revoir ses politiques migratoires, y compris trois lignes de défense: 1) Frontline – camps de réfugiés et centres de demande d’asile à créer en dehors de l’UE. 2) Frontières extérieures – Frontex pour mettre fin à l’immigration clandestine, au trafic et au trafic (etc.), avec 10 000 gardes-frontières. 3) Frontières intérieures – Meilleures pratiques nationales en matière de politiques migratoires à mettre en œuvre au niveau de l’UE. Les croisades modernes (en Libye, en Syrie, en Irak, en Afghanistan...) ont été la cause profonde de l’immigration récente. L’exportation des valeurs occidentales vers les eaux souterraines et l’arrière-pays de l’Est n’a pas été un grand succès. Nous exportons la démocratie et importons des réfugiés. L’UE doit repenser ses relations extérieures et ses politiques étrangères. L’UE a manifestement besoin de nouveaux médicaments pour son ancienne migraine migratoire.","ga":"Ba cheart don Aontas a bheartais imirce a athbhreithniú, lena n-áirítear trí bhealach cosanta: 1) Frontline – Campaí do dhídeanaithe agus ionaid iarratais tearmainn le bunú lasmuigh den AE. 2) Teorainneacha seachtracha – Frontex chun deireadh a chur leis an inimirce neamhdhleathach, leis an smuigleáil agus leis an ngáinneáil (etc.), le 10,000 garda teorann. Teorainneacha inmheánacha – Na dea-chleachtais náisiúnta maidir le beartais imirce atá le cur chun feidhme ar leibhéal an Aontais. Is iad crusades nua-aimseartha (chuig an Libia, an tSiria, an Iaráic, an Afganastáin...) ba bhunchúis leis an inimirce a tharla le déanaí. Níor éirigh go hiontach le luachanna an iarthair a easpórtáil go cúluiscí agus cúlchríocha thoir. Déanaimid an daonlathas a easpórtáil agus dídeanaithe a iompórtáil. Ní mór don AE athmhachnamh a dhéanamh ar a chaidreamh seachtrach agus ar a bheartais eachtracha. Is léir go bhfuil leigheas nua de dhíth ar an Aontas mar gheall ar an sean-mhígréin imirce.","hr":"EU bi trebao revidirati svoje migracijske politike, uključujući tri linije obrane: 1) Frontline – izbjeglički kampovi i centri za podnošenje zahtjeva za azil koji će se uspostaviti izvan EU-a. 2) Vanjske granice – Frontex će zaustaviti ilegalnu imigraciju, krijumčarenje i trgovanje ljudima (itd.), s 10 000 službenika graničnog nadzora. 3) Unutarnje granice – nacionalne najbolje prakse u migracijskim politikama koje će se provoditi na razini EU-a. Suvremeni križarski ratovi (za Libiju, Siriju, Irak, Afganistan...) bili su temeljni uzrok nedavne imigracije. Izvoz zapadnih vrijednosti u istočne rukavce i zaleđe nije bio velik uspjeh. Izvozimo demokraciju i uvozimo izbjeglice. EU mora ponovno razmotriti svoje vanjske odnose i vanjske politike. EU-u je jasno potreban novi lijek za svoju staru migrenu migracije.","hu":"Az EU-nak felül kell vizsgálnia migrációs politikáját, többek között három védelmi vonalat: 1) Frontline – Menekülttáborok és menedékkérelmi központok létrehozása az EU-n kívül. 2) Külső határok – a Frontex az illegális bevándorlás, a csempészet és az emberkereskedelem (stb.) megállítására 10 000 határőrrel rendelkezik. 3) Belső határok – Az uniós szinten végrehajtandó migrációs politikák bevált nemzeti gyakorlatai. A modern keresztes hadjáratok (Líbia, Szíria, Irak, Afganisztán...) voltak a közelmúltbeli bevándorlás kiváltó okai. A nyugati értékek keleti holtvízbe és hátországba történő exportálása nem volt nagy siker. Demokráciát exportálunk és menekülteket importálunk. Az EU-nak újra kell gondolnia külkapcsolatait és külpolitikáit. Az EU-nak nyilvánvalóan új gyógyszerre van szüksége a régi migrációs migrénjéhez.","it":"L'UE dovrebbe rivedere le sue politiche in materia di migrazione, comprese tre linee di difesa: 1) Frontline – campi profughi e centri di domanda di asilo da stabilirsi al di fuori dell'UE. 2) Frontiere esterne – Frontex per fermare l'immigrazione clandestina, il traffico e la tratta (ecc.), con 10.000 guardie di frontiera. 3) Frontiere interne – Migliori pratiche nazionali in materia di politiche migratorie da attuare a livello dell'UE. Le crociate moderne (in Libia, Siria, Iraq, Afghanistan...) sono state la causa principale della recente immigrazione. L'esportazione di valori occidentali nelle retrovie orientali e nell'entroterra non è stata un grande successo. Esportiamo la democrazia e importiamo i rifugiati. L'UE deve ripensare le sue relazioni esterne e le sue politiche estere. L'UE ha chiaramente bisogno di nuovi medicinali per la sua vecchia emicrania migratoria.","lt":"ES turėtų peržiūrėti savo migracijos politiką, įskaitant tris gynybos kryptis: 1) Frontline – Pabėgėlių stovyklos ir prieglobsčio prašymų centrai turi būti įsteigti už ES ribų. 2) Išorės sienos – FRONTEX sustabdyti nelegalią imigraciją, kontrabandą ir prekybą žmonėmis (ir kt.), su 10 000 sienos apsaugos pareigūnų. 3) Vidaus sienos – geriausia nacionalinė migracijos politikos praktika, kuri turi būti įgyvendinama ES lygmeniu. Šiuolaikinės kryžiaus žygiai (į Libiją, Siriją, Iraką, Afganistaną...) buvo pagrindinė pastarojo meto imigracijos priežastis. Vakarų vertybių eksportas į rytinius užpakalinius vandenis ir atokias teritorijas nebuvo labai sėkmingas. Mes eksportuojame demokratiją ir importuojame pabėgėlius. ES turi persvarstyti savo išorės santykius ir užsienio politiką. Akivaizdu, kad ES reikia naujų vaistų savo senajai migracijos migracijai.","lv":"ES būtu jāpārskata migrācijas politika, tostarp trīs aizsardzības virzieni: 1) Frontline – bēgļu nometnes un patvēruma pieteikumu centri, kas jāizveido ārpus ES. 2) Ārējās robežas – Frontex, lai apturētu nelegālo imigrāciju, kontrabandu un tirdzniecību (utt.), ar 10 000 robežsargiem. 3) Iekšējās robežas – valstu paraugprakse migrācijas politikā, kas īstenojama ES līmenī. Mūsdienu krusta kari (uz Lībiju, Sīriju, Irāku, Afganistānu...) ir bijuši nesenās imigrācijas pamatcēlonis. Rietumu vērtību eksportēšana uz austrumu atzveltnēm un iekšzemēm nav bijusi ļoti veiksmīga. Mēs eksportējam demokrātiju un importējam bēgļus. ES ir jāpārdomā savas ārējās attiecības un ārpolitika. Ir skaidrs, ka ES ir vajadzīgas jaunas zāles vecajai migrēnai.","mt":"L-UE għandha tirrevedi l-politiki tagħha dwar il-migrazzjoni, inklużi tliet linji ta’ difiża: 1) Frontline – kampijiet tar-refuġjati u ċentri ta ‘applikazzjoni għall-ażil li għandhom jiġu stabbiliti barra l-UE. 2) Fruntieri esterni – Frontex biex twaqqaf l-immigrazzjoni illegali, il-kuntrabandu u t-traffikar (eċċ.), b’10,000 għassiesa tal-fruntiera. 3) Il-fruntieri interni – L-aħjar prattiki nazzjonali fil-politiki dwar il-migrazzjoni li għandhom jiġu implimentati fil-livell tal-UE. Il-kruċjati moderni (il-Libja, is-Sirja, l-Iraq, l-Afganistan...) kienu l-kawża ewlenija tal-immigrazzjoni reċenti. L-esportazzjoni tal-valuri tal-Punent lejn il-parti ta’ wara tal-Lvant u lejn l-intern tal-pajjiż ma kinitx suċċess kbir. Aħna jesportaw id-demokrazija u l-importazzjoni refuġjati. L-UE għandha tikkunsidra mill-ġdid ir-relazzjonijiet esterni u l-politiki barranin tagħha. L-UE teħtieġ b’mod ċar mediċina ġdida għall-emigranja l-antika tagħha.","nl":"De EU moet haar migratiebeleid herzien, met inbegrip van drie verdedigingslijnen: 1) Frontline – Vluchtelingenkampen en asielaanvraagcentra die buiten de EU moeten worden gevestigd. 2) Buitengrenzen – Frontex om een einde te maken aan illegale immigratie, smokkel en mensenhandel (enz.), met 10.000 grenswachters. 3) Interne grenzen – Nationale beste praktijken op het gebied van migratiebeleid die op EU-niveau moeten worden uitgevoerd. Moderne kruistochten (naar Libië, Syrië, Irak, Afghanistan...) zijn de oorzaak van de recente immigratie. Het exporteren van westerse waarden naar oostelijke backwaters en achterland is geen groot succes geweest. Wij exporteren democratie en importeren vluchtelingen. De EU moet haar externe betrekkingen en buitenlands beleid heroverwegen. De EU heeft duidelijk nieuwe medicijnen nodig voor haar oude migratiemigraine.","pl":"UE powinna dokonać przeglądu swojej polityki migracyjnej, w tym trzech linii obrony: 1) Frontline - Obozy dla uchodźców i ośrodki składania wniosków o udzielenie azylu, które mają zostać utworzone poza UE. 2) Granice zewnętrzne - Frontex ma powstrzymać nielegalną imigrację, przemyt i handel ludźmi (np. 10 000 funkcjonariuszy straży granicznej). 3) Granice wewnętrzne - najlepsze praktyki krajowe w zakresie polityki migracyjnej, które mają być wdrażane na szczeblu UE. Współczesne krucjaty (do Libii, Syrii, Iraku, Afganistanu...) były główną przyczyną niedawnej imigracji. Eksport wartości zachodnich do wschodnich zaplecza i zaplecza nie był wielkim sukcesem. Eksportujemy demokrację i importujemy uchodźców. UE musi ponownie przemyśleć swoje stosunki zewnętrzne i politykę zagraniczną. UE wyraźnie potrzebuje nowych leków na starą migrenę migracyjną.","pt":"A UE deve rever as suas políticas de migração, incluindo três linhas de defesa: 1) Frontline - Campos de refugiados e centros de pedidos de asilo a serem estabelecidos fora da UE. 2) Fronteiras externas - Frontex para pôr termo à imigração ilegal, ao contrabando e ao tráfico (etc.), com 10 000 guardas de fronteira. 3) Fronteiras internas - Boas práticas nacionais em matéria de políticas de migração a aplicar a nível da UE. Cruzadas modernas (para a Líbia, Síria, Iraque, Afeganistão...) têm sido a causa raiz da imigração recente. A exportação de valores ocidentais para remansos orientais e sertões não tem sido um grande sucesso. Exportamos democracia e importamos refugiados. A UE deve repensar as suas relações externas e as suas políticas externas. A UE precisa claramente de novos medicamentos para a sua antiga enxaqueca migratória.","ro":"UE ar trebui să își revizuiască politicile în materie de migrație, inclusiv trei linii de apărare: 1) Frontline – tabere de refugiați și centre de cereri de azil care urmează să fie stabilite în afara UE. 2) Frontierele externe – Frontex trebuie să pună capăt imigrației ilegale, contrabandei și traficului (etc.), cu 10 000 de polițiști de frontieră. 3) Frontierele interne – cele mai bune practici naționale în materie de politici în domeniul migrației care urmează să fie puse în aplicare la nivelul UE. Cruciadele moderne (în Libia, Siria, Irak, Afganistan...) au fost cauza principală a imigrației recente. Exportul valorilor occidentale în apele de est și în hinterlanduri nu a fost un mare succes. Exportăm democrația și importăm refugiați. UE trebuie să își regândească relațiile externe și politicile externe. În mod clar, UE are nevoie de medicamente noi pentru vechea sa migrenă migratorie.","sk":"EÚ by mala zrevidovať svoje migračné politiky vrátane troch obranných línií: 1) Frontline – utečenecké tábory a centrá pre podávanie žiadostí o azyl, ktoré sa majú zriadiť mimo EÚ. 2) Vonkajšie hranice – Frontex na zastavenie nelegálneho prisťahovalectva, pašovania a obchodovania s ľuďmi (atď.) s 10 000 príslušníkmi pohraničnej stráže. 3) Vnútorné hranice – vnútroštátne najlepšie postupy v migračných politikách, ktoré sa majú vykonávať na úrovni EÚ. Hlavnou príčinou nedávneho prisťahovalectva boli moderné cestá (do Líbye, Sýrie, Iraku, Afganistanu...). Vývoz západných hodnôt do východných chrbtových vôd a vnútrozemia nebol veľkým úspechom. Vyvážame demokraciu a dovážame utečencov. EÚ musí prehodnotiť svoje vonkajšie vzťahy a zahraničné politiky. EÚ jednoznačne potrebuje nový liek na svoju starú migračnú migrénu.","sl":"EU bi morala revidirati svoje migracijske politike, vključno s tremi obrambnimi področji: 1) Frontline - begunska taborišča in centri za prošnje za azil, ki se ustanovijo zunaj EU. 2) Zunanje meje - Frontex bo ustavil nezakonito priseljevanje, tihotapljenje in trgovino z ljudmi (itd.) z 10 000 mejnimi policisti. 3) Notranje meje - nacionalne najboljše prakse na področju migracijskih politik, ki jih je treba izvajati na ravni EU. Sodobni križi (v Libijo, Sirijo, Irak, Afganistan...) so bili temeljni vzrok za nedavno priseljevanje. Izvoz zahodnih vrednot v vzhodne hrbtenice in zaledje ni bil velik uspeh. Izvažamo demokracijo in uvažamo begunce. EU mora ponovno razmisliti o svojih zunanjih odnosih in zunanji politiki. EU očitno potrebuje novo zdravilo za svojo staro migracijsko migreno.","sv":"EU bör se över sin migrationspolitik, inbegripet tre försvarslinjer: 1) Frontline – flyktingläger och asylcentrum som ska inrättas utanför EU. 2) De yttre gränserna – Frontex för att stoppa olaglig invandring, smuggling och människohandel (etc.), med 10 000 gränsvakter. 3) Inre gränser – nationell bästa praxis för migrationspolitik som ska genomföras på EU-nivå. Moderna korståg (till Libyen, Syrien, Irak, Afghanistan...) har varit den bakomliggande orsaken till den senaste tidens invandring. Att exportera västerländska värden till östra bakvatten och inlandet har inte varit någon stor framgång. Vi exporterar demokrati och importerar flyktingar. EU måste ompröva sina yttre förbindelser och sin utrikespolitik. EU behöver helt klart ny medicin för sin gamla migrän."}},"title":{"en":"Migration Migraine: EU to Erect 3 Lines of Defense","machine_translations":{"bg":"Миграция Мигрена: ЕС ще премахне 3 линии на отбраната","cs":"Migréna migrace: EU vymýtit 3 linie obrany","da":"Migrationsmigrænine: EU til at opsætte 3 forsvarslinjer","de":"Migration Migraine: EU baut 3 Verteidigungslinien auf","el":"Μετανάστευση ημικρανίας: Δημιουργία 3 γραμμών άμυνας από την ΕΕ","es":"Migración Migraña: La UE Ejecutará 3 Líneas de Defensa","et":"Migraiinmigratsioon: EL kuni 3 kaitseliini","fi":"Muuttoliike Migreeni: EU poistaa kolme puolustuslinjaa","fr":"Migration Migraine: L’UE va ériger 3 lignes de défense","ga":"An Imirce: An tAontas Eorpach chun 3 Línte Cosanta a Eagar","hr":"Migracijska migrena: EU će smanjiti 3 linije obrane","hu":"Migráció Migrén: Az EU három védelmi vonalat alakít ki","it":"Migrazione Emicrania: L'UE erige 3 linee di difesa","lt":"Migracija migrena: „EU to Erect 3“ gynybos linijos","lv":"Migrējoša migrēna: ES dzēš 3 aizsardzības līnijas","mt":"Migrazzjoni tal-migranja: L-UE għall-Erezzjoni 3 Linji ta’ Difiża","nl":"Migratie Migraine: EU om drie verdedigingslijnen op te richten","pl":"Migrena migracyjna: UE wyeliminuje 3 linie obrony","pt":"Enxaqueca migratória: UE a Erect 3 Linhas de Defesa","ro":"Migrație Migraină: UE la Erect 3 Linii de Apărare","sk":"Migrácia migréna: EÚ na odstránenie 3 línie obrany","sl":"Migracija migrena: EU bo izoblikovala 3 obrambne linije","sv":"Migrering av migrän: EU för att upprätta tre försvarslinjer"}}}
This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.
Share:
Share link:
Please paste this code in your page:
<script src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/Migration/f/34/proposals/75868/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://futureu.europa.eu/processes/Migration/f/34/proposals/75868/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
- Call us 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
- Use other telephone options
- Write to us via our contact form
- Meet us at a local EU office
- European Parliament
- European Council
- Council of the European Union
- European Commission
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
- European Central Bank (ECB)
- European Court of Auditors (ECA)
- European External Action Service (EEAS)
- European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
- European Committee of the Regions (CoR)
- European Investment Bank (EIB)
- European Ombudsman
- European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
- European Data Protection Board
- European Personnel Selection Office
- Publications Office of the European Union
- Agencies
15 comments
The frontline refugee camps and asylum application centers should be located outside the EU. They could take different forms:
EU delegations assisting as frontline offices, receiving, distributing and processing applications.
EU-owned or rented areas with extraterritorial status like embassies and military bases.
EU overseas territories, like Ceuta or Melilla.
EU penal colonies, like Île du Diable or Guantanamo Bay detention camp.
The EU needs to anticipate and address potential immigration waves and tsunamis already faraway of its shores – and near the epicenter of eruption (such as Afghanistan of Taliban).
Frontex should secure the external borders of the EU with adequate resources and capabilities for its duties, assisting national border and coast guards where required.
The resources and capabilities ought to be adequate for operations to protect air, sea and land borders:
1) Rescuing legal refugees and asylum-seekers.
2) Arresting illegal immigrants (fraudsters, smugglers, human traffickers).
3) Hunting spies, operatives, infiltrators, terrorists, freedom-fighters, intruders, special forces, etc.
Frontex should serve as the EU active reserve force to reinforce national border and coast guards in critical locations, as well as a rapid reaction force to be transported to locations where most urgently needed.
The EU should embrace the best practices of the EU Member States before re-designing its migration policies. It should start with two distinctively different forms of migration:
1) Humanitarian migration.
2) Non-humanitarian migration.
First: humanitarian migration means refugees and asylum-seekers. When revising its immigration policies, the EU should consider two questions: How to get the biggest bang for the buck? How to get the smallest bug for the bang? In other words, the EU should identify measures that generate the biggest benefits for a given cost (= development aid and other funds)? The EU should also seek to reduce the cost and risks of explosive immigration.
Second: non-humanitarian migration means investors, entrepreneurs, employees, students and family members. How could the EU and Member States attract the best and the brightest people? How to turn the brain drain into the brain gain?
The EU should learn from the best countries and cities in the world.
The EU is adversely affected by humanitarian immigration: refugees and asylum-seekers.
The refugees and asylum-seekers in faraway countries are easier to handle. If the EU sets up application centers for refugees and asylum-seekers outside the EU, the eligible immigrants can be pre-screened and selected in advance before they move to the EU.
The refugees and asylum-seekers who reach the EU borders – by hook or crook – are more difficult to handle. The international treaties should be amended to cater for modern realities (human trafficking, terrorist infiltration, hybrid war operations, etc.) in order to avoid obligations to let these “immigrants” in. The EU external borders should be sealed and closed.
All applications for humanitarian immigration to the EU should be processed outside the EU (barring some exceptional cases or emergency operations).
The EU institutions and agencies should bear the costs of humanitarian immigration to the EU:
Transportation to and from the EU.
Incentives for Member States to share the burden.
Compensation and/or the living costs of immigrants.
Repatriation to the country of origin or other safe place.
In order to cover the cost and finance the humanitarian immigration, the EU should seek to reach the UN target for development aid (0.7% of GDP). The EU budget and new own resources could be used to cover any deficit.
Alternatively, the Member States failing to reach the target might be requested to transfer the deficit funds to the EU budget. Or the EU could agree on the burden sharing and financing from the EU budget and national budgets (or the total development aid).
The EU and Member States should also refine their policies, practices and preferences for humanitarian immigration. What do they want?
Singles or families?
Broken families or extended families?
Children or adults?
Men or women?
Orphans or widows?
Tall or small?
Black or white?
Christians or Muslims?
Diversity of origin, or unity?
Etc.
This puzzle has many pieces.
The humanitarian immigrants convicted of serious crimes in the EU are predominantly young men (18 to 45 years of age).
Based on past experience, refugees and asylum-seekers should be profiled and screened to minimize the number of potential terrorists, criminals and other public enemies who enter the EU.
The humanitarian immigration should focus on women and children (escaping war or other humanitarian catastrophes), instead of deserters.
The EU should assess and evaluate whether International Conventions on refugees and asylum-seekers are still up-to-date – or require revisions.
The Geneva Refugee Convention of 28 July 1951 was initially limited to protecting European refugees from before 1 January 1951 (that is, after World War II).
The world has changed since the end of World War II, and the complex nature of 21st century refugee relationships may warrant a new treaty or at least amendments in the old ones
Is Europe responsible for refugees and asylum-seekers from Asia and Africa? Should North America bear the burden of immigrants from Latin America? How about the rest of the world?
As for non-humanitarian migration, the EU should enable and encourage the freedom of movement in the Schengen-area and beyond.
All three stages of migration encompass obstacles and opportunities:
EU citizens living, working and raising a family abroad (as expatriates).
EU citizens returning to their country of origin or elsewhere to settle down, retire, etc.
The EU employees in the European institutions and agencies have experienced the practical problems and prospects of migration by themselves. Other émigrés, expatriates and returnees share these experiences. Their knowledge and understanding, as well as incidents and encounters, should be utilized in developing, implementing and revising the EU migration policies.
The freedom of movement in the EU (of people, goods, services and capital) is the corner stone of the union.
Erasmus programs have greatly helped students and teachers to enjoy the academic freedom of movement. However, the exchange students and seconded teachers stay abroad only for a short time.
The EU could also act to make it easier for students to enroll in longer higher education overseas. Standardized examinations and certifications would establish a baseline proof for further studies. For example, a European Abitur/Baccalaureate/A-levels test and diploma would create a level playing field for all applicants to EU universities.
The test might include mathematics and three languages (mother tongue + 2 other languages). These subjects are easy to standardize objectively across the borders. The universities would also require proficiency in the language of science and in the language(s) of instruction.
Alternatively, it could be an IQ-test (like the ones used by the European Commission, Mensa or national armed forces) or Anglo-Saxon style GMAT or other tests for academic aptitude.
Around 3.3% of the EU citizens of working age (20 to 64) reside in an EU country other than that of their citizenship.
In 2019, most EU expats came from Romania (2,280,000 persons), Poland (1,079,000 persons), Italy (965,500 persons) and Portugal (655,600 persons). In relative terms, only 0.8% of German citizens moved abroad, while 19.4% of Romanian citizens did so. In 10 years from 2009 to 2019, the share of highly skilled mobile EU citizens rose by 6.1 percentage points (pp), ranging from 4.8 pp decrease in Bulgaria to 25 pp increase in Finland.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EUcitizenslivinginanotherMemberState-statistical_overview
Depending on the length of their stay, the expats make different choices for living, working and raising their families abroad. Choosing a kindergarten or school for their children is often the first decision.
The EU should produce statistics on bi- or multilingual primary education in the Member States.
Many migrants are EU expats returning to their country of origin, or elsewhere in the EU. The returnees come back to settle down, downshift, retire, or for old age and ill health, etc.
They face two issues:
1) Retirement benefits.
2) Health insurance.
Expats who work in different countries must take care of their own retirement and health care. They cannot rely on fragmented national systems.
The expats need a portable pension scheme. This could be a personal pension account. It might also be a private retirement insurance. Or maybe it should be an EU level public pension fund. Preferably, all three options would be available for the freedom of choice.
Expats also need a health insurance that is valid in any country in the EU, or even in the world. Again, three options should be available: personal health account, a private health insurance, or public health insurance at the EU level.
Expats need portable personal accounts (or insurance policies) for retirement and health care.
The EU must reverse its brain drain by healthy (non-humanitarian) immigration. The old continent should create new attractions for talented people.
A virtual World University with digital contents and online courses like Elements of AI.
A system of specialized research universities like Oxbridge, Ivy League or C9 League.
A platform for the international (academic) alumni of EU/European-born expatriates.
The EU/European “Silicon Valley”, “Wall Street”, “Hollywood”, “Las Vegas”, or “NHL”.
Etc.
The brain drain of the most gifted Europeans – future Nobel Prize winners, Field medalists, Touring Award holders, etc. – needs to be reversed into a brain gain of the best and the brightest immigrants.
EU should control the issuance of golden passports and residency visas in the Member States. These are investor schemes that allow non-EU citizens/residents to get an EU passport or residency visa in an EU Member State.
With the EU citizenship, the new EU passport holder may travel, live and work in the EU, or even vote in certain elections. The investor residency schemes, in turn, lead to residency visas in a given EU country. While residency does not confer the same freedoms as the EU citizenship, it does give a person the right to reside in the EU country, and to travel freely in the Schengen area.
In three EU countries (Cyprus, Malta, and Bulgaria) it is possible to get citizenship in exchange for an investment, known as “golden passports”, while 19 EU countries operate investment programs for residency permits, or “golden visas”.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/eu-commission-ramps-up-legal-action-against-cyprus-malta-over-golden-passports/
The war in Ukraine has forced around two million people to flee, following the Russian invasion.
They have mainly gone to the neighboring countries – Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Russia, Romania, Moldova and Belarus, as well as other European countries.
It appears that the distribution of refugees and asylum-seekers is now being rebalanced, with the Eastern European countries hosting them in larger numbers than the Southern, Western or Northern members of the EU.
Loading comments ...